You’ll learn
- Why starting late can be an advantage
- How generalists outperform specialists
- The link between creativity and broad interests
- To make connections that inspire innovation
russia has launched a full-scale war in Ukraine. Donate to support Ukraine and protect the world’s peace.

first KEY POINT
One of the best examples of early expertise is professional golf player Tiger Woods. His father, Earl Woods, started training him as soon as he could walk at just ten months old. Tiger engaged in “deliberate practice,” practicing golf most of the time. At age two, Tiger entered his first tournament and won the ten-and-under division. By the time he got to college, he was already world-famous for his exceptional sportsmanship. Today, he ranks among the greatest golfers of all time.Tiger has come to symbolize the myth that is predominant in our society today — that success hinges on the quantity and early commencement of deliberate practice.
Contrast this with Roger Federer, whose upbringing defied the Tiger model. Even though his mother was a tennis coach, she never forced him to play the game. Federer grew up playing various sports and only started focusing on tennis in his teenage years. But this didn’t hamper his development in the long run. Today, he is widely deemed one of the greatest tennis players ever.While society glorifies the stories of athletes following the Tiger path, the Roger path to stardom is more common. In-depth analyses of athletes' development trajectories from early childhood reveal that future champions don't initially devote most of their time to intense training.Instead, they undergo a “sampling phase,” exploring different sports to acquire various skills before focusing on one.While there is no doubt that some fields require people with Tiger's clarity and early skill, the world also needs more Rogers as complexity increases. We need people with range — individuals who start broad and embrace diverse experiences and perspectives as they progress.
second KEY POINT
Do specialists really get better with experience? Psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Gary Klein independently conducted several studies to answer this question. They both found out that there is no substantial correlation between experience and expertise.According to Kahneman and Klein, the main factor determining whether experience will inevitably lead to expertise depends on the domain. For example, while specific experience benefits some fields, like chess or firefighting, it falls short for financial or political analysts.Other studies have also proven that experience and repetition simply did not improve performance or learning in a wide range of real-world scenarios. This occurrence is especially true for those domains which involve human behavior and where there is no apparent repetition of patterns.

Continue reading with Headway app
Continue readingfirst KEY POINT
second KEY POINT
third KEY POINT
fourth KEY POINT
fifth KEY POINT